data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2742b/2742be54d965e4911b1eed35ebaa55b67a216f44" alt=""
A little over a year ago when I was researching GPS watches the Nike+ Sports watch was getting pretty good reviews from users and the price point was very attractive to someone who just got into running vs. the other brands on the market. The first time I connected it to satellite it did take a little bit to acquire, but I thought that was normal. From that point on it would usually take anywhere between 15 seconds and 2 minutes to acquire a signal, but in the last couple of months it was taking up to 10 minutes or in the case of my run on Wednesday, not at all. The watch is powered by TomTom, and I recently read online that Nike and TomTom had parted ways, which is probably the reason for my issues.
Over the past couple
months I began doing a lot of research online for what would become its replacement. Pretty much all the reviews pointed towards
the new Garmin Forerunner 220 or 620.
While I was in San Diego
for Ragnar I was able to get some great feed back from my teammates that used
both the models. While everyone had
raving reviews of them the biggest tip I took away was from Katie. She stated that if she had to do it over
again she would have saved her money and just got the 220, the few upgrades you
get with the 620, in her opinion, was not worth the cost difference, and I
agreed.
Now the only
reason this post is even possible today is because of the love and support from
my Mother and Father. They have been so
supportive and proud of my running and weight loss that when they heard about
the issues I was having they thought an early Birthday/Christmas present would
help with my upcoming marathon training.
So I just wanted to say Thank You both so much for your support, not
just now but for everything you have done and/or sacrificed for me over the
years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a20d/9a20d934bc8672c92cd41191b679750c0f7bca59" alt=""
I got to head out
Sunday and take the watch for a spin, and all I can really say is, wow it was
nice. It didn’t feel heavy on my wrist
and again I wasn’t even out my door and I already had satellite signal. I did a simple 4 mile loop just so I could
get use to it and play with the features.
I did find that I had to re-adjust the data fields; I had the elapsed
time showing vs. the lap or mile time which I prefer. The big test for me on the accuracy of the
watch came this morning when I did a 4 mile out and back run. All my previous out and back runs with my
Nike watch were off by as much as a couple hundred yards. I would assume that if I start at a line, ran
till the watch said two miles, turned right around and came back to that line,
it should be four miles. Well with my
Nike I was going past that line every time and most of the time it was by a
large amount. Well today’s test landed
me at the 4 mile mark within 3-5 feet of the line, which if that trend
continues then I will have to say this watch is pretty damn accurate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4c85/a4c859c9b3c0172248c59f015e9030cdfa238db4" alt=""
yay! Glad you like it! I love my 220 as well...I gave the TomTom a fair chance for a month or so but the Garmin is way better, in my opinion. What a nice gift and show of support for your running by your parents! Your cadence, by the way, is awesome! I wish I could get numbers like that!...maybe I need to run faster :)
ReplyDeleteYay! Congrats on the Garmin. You'll love it (and looks like you already do!). You'll have to let me know your Garmin Connect username so we can stalk, err keep up to date with each other.
ReplyDelete